The introductory chapter of this NRC book summarizes an earlier NRC report How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School.
They describe three key principles:
1. New knowledge must connect to existing knowledge already learned.
2. Facts and conceptual framework go together, hand-in-hand. A framework with facts is relatively meaningless (an empty framework) and facts without a framework make no sense, cannot be retained, or recalled.
3. Metacognition (understanding tips, tricks, and principles of learning) helps facilitate learning.
One common trap that I fall into is that I fail to appreciate what a limited experience most students students have of the natural world. Therefore, I fail to connect to their existing knowledge base. To connect this to the principles above, I fail to give students enough facts for a new conceptual framework. I assume that they already have lots of facts in hand (what a maple tree looks like, or what a sow bug acts like). What I may want to do is say or ask:
- "Here is a new conceptual framework, and here is how it works and what it is good for."
- "Here is a specific example of an empirical experiment that helped confirm the utility of this framework. This is how this example fits into this framework."
- "Here is another example...can you figure out how this example fits into the framework?"
- "Here are more examples. Go for it."
- "Can you find other examples?"
- "Can you imagine other ways to investigate the natural world using this framework?"
- "What do you like about this framework? What do you find confusing or frustrating about this framework?"
- "How might you modify this framework?"
No comments:
Post a Comment